Skip to content
Home » Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

Our Editorial Mission

The local search industry suffers from a massive signal to noise ratio. We built Local Map Ranking Hub to cut through the static. We provide data backed strategies to dominate the local map pack. We don’t guess about Google Business Profile ranking factors. We test them.

Three years of testing. Zero shortcuts. Real results.

Our editorial team operates with strict independence. We publish what works for our clients in the field. We ignore unproven theories. If a tactic doesn’t move a local business higher in the map pack, we refuse to publish it. You deserve high-resolution clarity on what actually drives phone calls and foot traffic.

How We Choose Topics

We source our topics directly from the friction points local business owners face daily. We don’t rely on generic keyword research tools to build our content calendar. We look at our own agency data.

When an HVAC contractor in Phoenix loses their map pack position after an algorithm update, we investigate. We track proximity signal shifts across different city grids. We monitor how review velocity impacts rankings in highly competitive niches like personal injury law or emergency plumbing. We write about the exact problems costing you leads right now.

We read it. We tested it. We published it.

We actively ignore broad, theoretical SEO topics. If a subject doesn’t directly impact local map visibility or GBP conversion rates, it doesn’t belong on this site.

Research and Fact Checking Standards

Google’s official documentation leaves massive blind spots for practitioners. We fill those gaps with operational reality. Every claim published on Local Map Ranking Hub undergoes rigorous internal verification.

Before we publish a guide on NAP consistency, we test the exact citation building process across 50 distinct directories. We measure the indexing rate. We track the subsequent map pack movement over a 90-day period. We require hard data before we call anything a best practice.

Our writers must cite primary sources. We link directly to Google patents, official Search Central updates, or our own documented case studies. We never accept industry consensus as a valid source.

The industry is frequently wrong.

Corrections Policy

The local algorithm shifts constantly. Tactics decay. Sometimes we make a mistake.

When we publish an error, we own it and fix it immediately. You can report factual inaccuracies directly to our team at [email protected]. A senior local SEO specialist reviews every correction request within 48 hours.

If we verify a mistake, we update the content. We append a clear correction notice at the bottom of the affected page. We detail exactly what was changed and when.

Transparency builds trust.

Affiliate and Commercial Relationships

We run a local SEO agency. We sell map ranking services to local businesses. We also use affiliate links to fund our research.

When we mention tools like BrightLocal, Whitespark, or Places Scout, we often include an affiliate link. If you click that link and purchase the software, we earn a small commission. This doesn’t increase your cost.

Financial incentives never dictate our recommendations. We recommend a tool because it survives our daily operational grind. We’ve canceled subscriptions to major software platforms that failed to deliver accurate local grid tracking. We’ll never recommend a product we don’t actively use in our own client campaigns.

Editorial Independence

Nobody buys a positive review on Local Map Ranking Hub.

We reject all sponsored posts. We ignore pitch emails from software vendors demanding coverage. We don’t accept payment in exchange for backlinks. Our editorial team maintains absolute control over the publishing schedule and content direction.

If a popular local SEO tool releases a broken feature, we’ll point it out. We protect our readers, not software vendors.

Content Updates and Freshness

Local SEO advice expires rapidly. A tactic that dominated the map pack last spring will get your GBP suspended today.

We audit our core strategy guides quarterly. We check every link, verify every software screenshot, and test every recommended process against the current algorithm. We stamp every article with a clear updated date at the top of the page.

If a strategy stops working, we don’t just tweak the wording. We rewrite the entire guide to reflect current operational reality.